Psychology: Obedience and Helping behavior

(ITP-32) Obedience, Helping behavior

Exploring Human Nature: Obedience, Helping Behavior, and Altruism

Introduction: As psychology students, we embark on a journey to understand the complexities of human behavior. In this blog, we delve into three fascinating topics: obedience, helping behavior, and altruism. These concepts shed light on how individuals respond to authority, extend support to others, and exhibit selfless acts. Let's unravel the intricacies of human nature and gain valuable insights into these fundamental aspects of psychology!

I.              Obedience:

Following Orders or Blindly Complying? Obedience refers to the act of following the commands or instructions of an authority figure. It is a powerful force that can shape individuals' behavior and decisions. Let's explore obedience in more detail:

1. Milgram's Shock Experiment: Stanley Milgram's landmark study on obedience demonstrated the extent to which individuals would obey authority, even if it meant causing harm to others. The experiment revealed that a staggering 65% of participants were willing to administer potentially lethal electric shocks to another person, simply because they were instructed to do so by an authority figure.
2. Factors Influencing Obedience: Various factors influence obedience levels, including the perceived legitimacy and credibility of the authority figure, the proximity and immediacy of the situation, and the presence of dissenting voices. Understanding these factors helps us comprehend why individuals may succumb to obedience even when it contradicts their personal values.

II.            Helping Behavior:

Extending a Helping Hand Helping behavior encompasses acts of kindness and assistance towards others. It reflects our innate social nature and the desire to alleviate suffering. Let's delve deeper into the factors that influence helping behavior:

1. Bystander Effect: The bystander effect refers to the phenomenon where individuals are less likely to offer help in the presence of others. Diffusion of responsibility, social influence, and ambiguity of the situation contribute to this phenomenon. Studies have shown that the likelihood of receiving help decreases as the number of bystanders increases.
2. Empathy and Altruism: Empathy, the ability to understand and share others' emotions, plays a crucial role in promoting helping behavior. Altruism, the selfless concern for the well-being of others, is often the driving force behind acts of kindness. Research suggests that individuals with higher levels of empathy and altruism are more likely to engage in helping behavior.

III.           Altruism:

 The Selfless Act of Giving Altruism refers to acts of selflessness and concern for the welfare of others. Let's explore the underlying factors and theories related to altruistic behavior:

1. Kin Selection Theory: According to kin selection theory, individuals are more likely to exhibit altruistic behavior towards their close relatives. This behavior can be explained by the desire to ensure the survival and propagation of shared genes.
2. Reciprocity and Social Exchange: The reciprocity principle suggests that individuals are more likely to help others who have helped them in the past or are expected to reciprocate in the future. Social exchange theory posits that helping behavior is driven by a cost-benefit analysis, where individuals weigh the potential rewards and costs associated with helping.
3. Pure Altruism: Pure altruism refers to acts of selfless giving without any expectation of personal gain. It involves genuine concern for others' well-being and is often driven by empathy and a moral sense of duty.

IV. Encouraging Prosocial Behavior:

1. Empathy Training: Developing empathy through training programs and educational interventions can enhance helping behavior. Teaching individuals to understand and share the emotions of others can promote a more compassionate and caring society.
2. Norms and Role Modeling: Creating and reinforcing social norms that promote helping behavior can significantly influence individuals' actions. By highlighting and celebrating acts of kindness and altruism, societies can encourage prosocial behavior.

Conclusion: Obedience, helping behavior, and altruism shed light on the intricate dynamics of human behavior. While obedience can lead to both positive and negative outcomes, helping behavior and altruism demonstrate our inherent capacity for empathy, kindness, and selflessness. Understanding the factors that influence these behaviors and taking steps to encourage prosocial acts can contribute to a more compassionate and harmonious world. As aspiring psychologists, let us embrace the power of empathy and altruism to make a positive impact on individuals and society as a whole.

Top of Form

Regenerate response

 

Psychology: Social Facilitation & Attribution Theory

(ITP-30) Social Facilitation & Attribution Theory

Abstract:

Social facilitation is the improved performance of individuals on simple tasks when in the presence of others. It is caused by evaluation apprehension, co-actors, increased arousal, and distraction. It enhances performance, increases effort, amplifies dominant responses, and simplifies tasks. However, it can also lead to social inhibition during complex tasks. Understanding social facilitation optimizes learning, teamwork, and productivity by considering individual and social factors. Attribution theory explains how individuals attribute performance in social facilitation situations. Overall, social facilitation improves performance on simple tasks but may hinder performance on complex ones.

Social Facilitation

Social facilitation refers to the phenomenon in which people tend to perform better on simple or well-learned tasks when they are in the presence of others compared to when they are alone. It is a form of social influence that can lead to enhanced performance or increased arousal in a group setting. The concept of social facilitation was first introduced by social psychologist Norman Triplett in 1898.
Causes of Social Facilitation:

1. Evaluation Apprehension: Awareness of being observed or evaluated by others can increase arousal and motivation, improving performance on familiar tasks.
2. Presence of Co-actors: Working alongside others can create competition or comparison, leading to heightened arousal, increased effort, and improved performance on known tasks.
3. Increased Alertness and Arousal: The presence of others can raise arousal levels, facilitating the activation of dominant responses and improving performance on simple or well-practiced tasks.
4. Distraction Theory: The presence of others may distract attention from complex tasks, potentially leading to poorer performance. However, for simple tasks, the presence of others can enhance performance.

It's important to note that social facilitation effects can vary depending on the individual, the nature of the task, and the specific context. While social facilitation generally leads to improved performance on simple or well-learned tasks, it may result in decreased performance on complex or unfamiliar tasks.

Effects

Social facilitation can have various effects on individuals' performance and behavior. Here are the key effects associated with social facilitation:

1. Enhanced Performance: Social facilitation improves performance on simple or familiar tasks due to increased arousal and alertness.
2. Increased Effort: The presence of others motivates individuals to exert more effort and energy in their performance.
3. Amplified Dominant Responses: Social facilitation amplifies individuals' most likely or habitual responses, benefiting those who are skilled in a particular activity.
4. Task Simplification: Individuals simplify tasks to manage arousal and focus on salient aspects, improving performance on simple tasks but potentially hindering complex ones.
5. Social inhibition: Sometimes, the presence of others can hinder performance, known as social inhibition. This occurs during complex tasks that require concentration. Heightened self-consciousness and distraction can lead to a decline in performance.

Significance

· Social facilitation is significant due to its impact on performance enhancement, particularly on simple or well-practiced tasks.

·      It highlights the influence of others on individual behavior and performance in domains such as sports, education, and the workplace.

·  Understanding social facilitation helps optimize learning environments, teamwork, and productivity. It also sheds light on the interplay between individual and social factors, providing insights into social influence processes and the formation of collective behavior.

Conclusion:

In summary, attribution theory provides a framework for understanding the attributions individuals make regarding the causes of performance in social facilitation situations. The attributions, whether internal or external, shape individuals' understanding of their own and others' performance in the presence of others, thereby influencing the observed effects of social facilitation.

References:

1. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 507-533.
2. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269-274.
3. Cottrell, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation in the cockroach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 239-244.
4. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-40.
5. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 265-292.
6. Guerin, B. (1986). Social facilitation: A review and alternative interpretation of data. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 289-322). Academic Press.
7. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427-459.
8. Stroebe, W. (2012). The social psychology of social facilitation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 147-166.

Psychology: Personality Assessment

(ITP-29) Personality Assessment

Abstract: Personality assessment is a proficiency in professional psychology that involves the administration, scoring and interpretation of empirically supported measures of personality traits and styles. There are various ways to assess personality. They can be subjective, projective and objective.

Subjective Methods:

Autobiography: It is the narration by individual given either freely or according to certain subject headings provided by the examiner. It is the source of revealing the self and personality of a person.

Interview: It is the most common method of judging personality. The interaction with the person and letting him or her speak gives a clear picture of the person.

Case history: It gives information about the individual’s parents, grandparents, background or medical history. This method aids in understanding the personality patterns of an individual who is a problem or maladjusted.

Questionnaire: It is another method of assessing personality. The questions provided describe certain traits, emotions or behaviors in situations revealing personality.

Projective tests

Rorschach personality test: It was published by herman rorschach in 1921. It is based on inkblots. It is an individual test in which the subject looks at the 10 ambiguous inkblot’s pictures and describes what they see in each picture.  Their responses help in assessing their personality.

Word Association test: It is also known as non-pictorial projective test. This technique was invented by francis galton in 1879 for use in exploring the individual differences. It is a test in which the participant responds to a stimulus word with the first word that comes to mind.

House Tree Person test: It is a type of test in which the test taker responds to or provides ambiguous, abstract or unstructured stimuli (often in the form of pictures and drawings.) It is used to assess the specific complex personality traits.

Thematic Apperception test: It is based on murray’s theory which distinguishes 28 human needs. The procedure includes presenting a series of pictures to a subject. The subject then has to make a story by seeing the picture. It is useful in comprehensive study and interpretation of personality, behavior disorders, etc.

Objective Tests

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI): It is a true and false self-report questionnaire. The heart of this test consists of it’s validity, clinical and content scales. The purpose of mmpi is to assist in distinguishing normal from abnormal groups. Specifically, the test was designed to help in the diagnosis of the major psychiatric and psychological disorders.

California Personality Inventory(CPI): It attempts to evaluate personality in normally adjusted individuals. The test contains 18 scales each of which is grouped into one of four classes. There are class i scales, class ii scales, class iii scales and class iv scales.

Neo-pi-r (big five): This test was developed specifically to measure the big five traits. One innovative feature of this test is its public and private version. The neo-pi-r assesses each of the five major personality dimensions and it also assesses the six sub-dimensions that make up the main dimensions.

16 Personality Factor Questionnaire:

16 personality factor questionnaire was designed by r.b. Cattell. This personality test is based on trait theories. Cattell reduced personality to 16 basic dimensions which he called source traits. He also collected all the adjectives applicable to humans to empirically measure and determines essence of the personality.

Conclusion:

Personality is the combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual distinctive character. There are various methods in psychology that aids us to assess the personality or to measure the personal characteristics. These methods can be objective, subjective or projective.

1. Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Hersen, M., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (Eds.). (2017). Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Volume 1: Intellectual and neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
3. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., ... & Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128-165.
4. Millon, T., & Davis, R. D. (1996). Disorders of personality: DSM-IV and beyond (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
5. Morey, L. C. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
6. Piotrowski, C., & Keller, J. W. (Eds.). (2016). Psychological assessment and report writing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
7. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2015). Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior, and context (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
8. Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of personality disorders. Oxford University Press.
9. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Garb, H. N. (2003). What's wrong with the Rorschach? Science confronts the controversial inkblot test. John Wiley & Sons.

Psychology: Defining personality, Theories of personality

 (ITP-28) Defining personality, Theories of personality

Abstract:Personality is a fundamental aspect of human psychology, encompassing an individual's unique traits, behaviors, and cognitive patterns. The study of personality and its theories in psychology seeks to understand the underlying factors that shape and influence an individual's consistent patterns of behavior. This abstract provides a concise overview of personality and theories of personality, highlighting key concepts and approaches within the field. It emphasizes the significance of personality in psychology and its relevance for understanding human behavior and individual differences.

Personality:

Introduction:

Personality refers to the unique patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that define an individual’s personal style of interacting with others .It encompasses various traits, motivations, and cognitive processes that shape an individual's behavior. Psychologists look at the theories of personality to help them study people. Personality is made up consistent and long lasting patterns of behavior.

Theories of personality:

Theories of personality are described below.

Psychodynamic Theory of Personality by Sigmund Freud: 

Sigmund Freud, a pioneer in the field of psychology, developed the Psychodynamic Theory of Personality. This theory suggests that our personalities are shaped by unconscious desires, conflicts, and childhood experiences. Freud proposed three major components of the mind: the id, ego, and superego.

• The Id: According to Freud, the id represents our primal, instinctual desires and operates on the pleasure principle, seeking immediate gratification without considering social norms or consequences.
• The Ego: The ego acts as the mediator between the id and the external world. It operates on the reality principle, balancing the id's desires with societal expectations and norms.
• The Superego: The superego represents our internalized moral standards and societal values. It strives for perfection and guides our behavior through a sense of guilt and conscience.

Psychoanalytical Theory of Personality by Carl Jung:

Carl Jung, a renowned psychologist and Freud's contemporary, developed the Psychoanalytical Theory of Personality. While influenced by Freud's work, Jung expanded on the concept of the unconscious and introduced his own ideas.

• Collective Unconscious: Jung proposed the existence of a collective unconscious, a reservoir of shared ancestral memories and experiences that influence our behavior and personality. This collective unconscious contains archetypes, universal symbols and themes that shape our thoughts and behavior.
• Persona and Shadow: Jung introduced the concept of persona, the social mask we wear to present ourselves to the world. The shadow, on the other hand, represents our hidden, unconscious aspects that we repress or deny.
• Introversion and Extraversion: Jung also introduced the dimensions of introversion and extraversion, suggesting that individuals have different orientations towards the external world. Introverts focus more on internal thoughts and experiences, while extraverts draw energy from social interactions.

Theory of Psychosocial Development by Erik Erikson: 

Erik Erikson's Theory of Psychosocial Development expands upon Freud's ideas by emphasizing the role of social and cultural factors in shaping personality. He proposed eight stages of development that individuals go through from infancy to old age.

1.    Trust vs. Mistrust: Infancy (0-1 year) In the first stage, infants learn to trust or mistrust the world based on the consistency and reliability of their caregivers' responses to their needs.

2.    Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt: Early Childhood (1-3 years) During the toddler years, children develop a sense of independence and autonomy. If their exploration and decision-making abilities are supported, they develop a sense of self-control; otherwise, they may experience shame and doubt.

3.    Initiative vs. Guilt: Preschool (3-6 years) Children explore and take initiative, but may feel guilty if they make mistakes or are criticized.

4.    Industry vs. Inferiority: School Age (6-12 years) In middle childhood, children develop competence and a sense of industry through mastering skills and receiving recognition. If they face repeated failures or criticisms, they may develop feelings of inferiority.

5.    Identity vs. Role Confusion: Adolescence (12-18 years) Adolescence is a critical stage for identity formation, where individuals explore various roles and values to establish a cohesive sense of self. Failure to achieve a clear identity may lead to confusion and role diffusion.

6.    Intimacy vs. Isolation: Young Adulthood (18-40 years) In early adulthood, individuals seek to form deep, meaningful relationships and intimate connections. Failure to establish intimacy can lead to feelings of isolation and loneliness.

7.    Generativity vs. Stagnation: Middle Adulthood (40-65 years) During middle adulthood, individuals focus on contributing to society and leaving a lasting impact through their work, family, and community involvement. Those who lack a sense of generativity may experience stagnation and a lack of fulfillment.

8.    Ego Integrity vs. Despair: Late Adulthood (65+ years) In late adulthood, individuals reflect on their lives and evaluate the meaning and value of their accomplishments. Those who feel a sense of satisfaction and wisdom develop ego integrity, while others may experience despair and regret.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, theories of personality, including the psychodynamic theory by Sigmund Freud, the psychoanalytical theory by Carl Jung, and the psychosocial development theory by Erik Erikson, provide valuable insights into understanding the complexities of human behavior and individual differences. These theories highlight the role of unconscious desires, childhood experiences, societal influences, and personal growth in shaping personality. By studying these theories, psychology students can gain a deeper understanding of themselves and others, enhancing their knowledge and practice in the field of psychology.

References:

1. Cloninger, C. R. (2013). Theories of Personality: Understanding Persons. Pearson.
2. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. Norton & Company.
3. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
4. Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition, 4-5.
5. Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIX (1923-1925): The Ego and the Id and Other Works, 3-66.
6. Jung, C. G. (1968). Analytical Psychology: Its Theory and Practice. Routledge.
7. Jung, C. G. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton University Press.
8. McAdams, D. P. (2006). The Person: A New Introduction to Personality Psychology. Wiley.
9. Pervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Personality: Theory and Research. John Wiley & Sons.

Top of Form

 

Psychology: Theories of Emotions

 

(ITP-27) Theories of Emotion

Abstract: Emotions are complex psychological and physiological experiences triggered by various stimuli. The major theories of emotion fall into three categories: physiological, neurological, and cognitive. The James-Lange theory posits that emotions result from physiological reactions to events. In contrast, the Cannon-Bard theory suggests emotional responses occur independently of physiological states. The Schachter-Singer theory, a cognitive approach, proposes that emotions stem from the interpretation of physiological arousal in a given situation. These theories offer insights into the nature and functioning of emotions, emphasizing the interplay between bodily sensations, cognition, and emotional experiences. Understanding emotions is crucial for comprehending human behavior and improving psychological well-being.

What are emotions?

 

Emotions are complex psychological and physiological experiences that are generally temporary in nature.

They can be triggered by a variety of external and internal stimuli, and are often accompanied by distinct feelings and bodily sensations.

Emotions have been studied for centuries, but there are still many competing theories about what they are and how they work.

Some of these theories focus on specific aspects of emotions like their evolutionary purpose or their cognitive underpinnings

 

Types of Theories of Emotion

 

The major theories of emotion can be grouped into three main categories:

 

1)       Physiological theories suggest that responses within the body are responsible for emotions.

 

2)      Neurological theories propose that activity within the brain leads to emotional responses.

 

3)     Cognitive theories argue that thoughts and other mental activities play an essential role in forming emotions.

 

Theories of Emotion

The James-Lange Theory of Emotion:

The James-Lange theory is one of the best-known examples of a physiological theory of emotion. Independently proposed by psychologist William James and physiologist Carl Lange, the James- Lange theory of emotion suggests that emotions occur as a result of physiological reactions to events.

For example, suppose you are walking in the woods and see a grizzly bear. You begin to tremble, and your heart begins to race. The James- Lange theory proposes that you will conclude that you are frightened ("I am trembling. Therefore, I am afraid"). According to this theory of emotion, you are not trembling because you are frightened. Instead, you feel frightened because you are trembling. 

The Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion:

Another well-known physiological theory is the Cannon-Bard theory of emotion. Walter Cannon disagreed with the James-Lange theory of emotion on several different grounds. First, he suggested, people can experience physiological reactions linked to emotions without actually feeling those emotions. For example, your heart might race because you have been exercising, not because you are afraid.

Cannon also suggested that emotional responses occur much too quickly to be simply products of physical states. When you encounter a danger in the environment, you will often feel afraid before you start to experience the physical symptoms associated with fear, such as shaking hands, rapid breathing, and a racing heart

Schachter-Singer Theory:

Also known as the two-factor theory of emotion, the Schachter-Singer theory is an example of a cognitive theory of emotion. This theory suggests that the physiological arousal occurs first, and then the individual must identify the reason for this arousal to experience and label it as an emotion. A stimulus leads to a physiological response that is then cognitively interpreted and labeled, resulting in an emotion.

Schachter and Singer’s theory draws on both the James-Lange theory and the Cannon-Bard theory. Like the James-Lange theory, the Schachter-Singer theory proposes that people infer emotions based onPhysiological responses. The critical factor is the situation and the cognitive interpretation that people use to label that emotion.

Conclusion: Emotions are complex, influenced by physiology and cognition. The James-Lange theory links emotions to physiological reactions, while the Cannon-Bard theory suggests they can occur independently. The Schachter-Singer theory emphasizes cognitive interpretation. Understanding emotions is crucial for human behavior and well-being.

Referances:

1.    Cannon, W. B. (1927). The James-Lange theory of emotions: A critical examination and an alternative theory. The American Journal of Psychology, 39(1/4), 106-124.

2.    Cannon-Bard, W. (1927). The James-Lange theory of emotions: A critical examination and an alternative theory. Psychological Review, 34(4), 281-295.

3.    James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188-205.

4.    Lange, C. G. (1887). On emotions: A contribution to the physiological explanation of emotion. Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 1(4), i-56.

5.    Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379-399.

6.    Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 39-88). Academic Press.

7.    Wundt, W. (1896). Grundriss der Psychologie. Wilhelm Engelmann.