(TALS-05) Teacher-Centered Approaches VS Student-Centered Approaches in Education
Abstract: This article compares and contrasts
teacher-centered and student-centered approaches to teaching and learning.
Teacher-centered learning places the teacher as the primary authority figure
responsible for presenting information and directing learning. In contrast,
student-centered learning prioritizes active student participation and the
exploration of personal interests and needs. The article discusses various
high-tech and low-tech teaching methods under each approach, such as direct
instruction and differentiated instruction. The benefits and drawbacks of each
approach are also explored. While teacher-centered methods are efficient and
structured, they may not cater to individual learning needs or fully engage all
students. Conversely, student-centered methods promote critical thinking and
problem-solving skills, leading to deeper learning outcomes.
Introduction: In the field of educational
psychology, there are various approaches to teaching and learning. Two major
parameters that differentiate these approaches are teacher-centered and
student-centered methods. Teacher-centered approaches emphasize the role of the
teacher as the primary authority figure, while student-centered approaches
prioritize the active participation of students in the learning process.
Teacher-Centered
Approach to Learning
In a
teacher-centered approach to learning, the teacher is the main authority
figure.
·
Teachers as the main
authority figure: The
teacher is responsible for presenting information to students and directing
their learning. The focus is the teacher's knowledge and expertise rather than
the students' needs or interests.
·
Students are considered
empty vessels waiting to be filled with knowledge: They are passive receivers of
information and are expected to absorb what the teacher is teaching.
·
Students as passive
receivers of information: Students
are expected to learn and recall information as it is presented to them.
·
Teaching and assessment: in a teacher-centered approach are
typically based on lectures, memorization, and testing. The teacher is the one
who assesses the students' knowledge and determines if they have learned the
material.
Student-Centered Approach to Learning
In a
student-centered approach to learning, the primary focus is on the students'
needs and interests.
·
Equally active role of
teachers and students in the learning process: The teacher plays an equally active
role with the students in the learning process. The teacher's role is to
facilitate learning rather than to direct it.
·
Primary focus on
students' needs and interests:
Students are active participants in their learning and are encouraged to
explore and discover knowledge on their own.
·
Encouragement of
critical thinking and problem-solving skills: In a student-centered approach, the
teacher encourages critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
·
Supportive environment
for students to ask questions and express their ideas: The teacher provides a supportive
environment where students feel comfortable asking questions and expressing
their ideas.
·
Assessment based on
learning outcomes rather than test scores: Assessment is based on a variety of methods, such as
project-based learning, portfolio assessments, and peer assessments. The focus
is on learning outcomes rather than test scores.
Teacher-Centered
Methods of Instruction
There are
various teacher-centered methods of instruction.
High-tech methods of
instruction
refer to teaching methods that use technology or digital resources to enhance
the learning experience
1.
Flipped classrooms, are a high-tech method of instruction
that involves students learning the material on their own through online
resources before coming to class.
2.
Inquiry-Based Learning is a high-tech method that encourages
students to explore and discover knowledge on their own.
3. Expeditionary Learning
is a high-tech
method that involves students learning through real-world experiences. Students
work on projects that involve them in solving real-world problems.
4. Personalized Learning is
a high-tech
method that involves students working at their own pace and on their own level.
The teacher provides personalized instruction that meets the needs of
individual students.
5.
Game-Based Learning is a high-tech method that uses video
games to teach and reinforce learning objectives. This method is particularly
effective for engaging students who may not be motivated by traditional
teaching methods.
Low-tech
teacher-centered methods of instruction
refer to traditional teaching methods that do not use digital resources.
1.
Direct instruction is a low-tech method that involves
the teacher presenting information to the students in a lecture format. The
teacher is the main authority figure, and the students are passive receivers of
information.
2.
Kinesthetic learning is a low-tech method that involves
students learning through physical activities, such as building models or
performing experiments. This method is particularly effective for students who
learn best through hands-on experiences.
3.
Differentiated
Instruction is a low-tech
method that involves the teacher tailoring the instruction to meet the needs of
individual students. The teacher provides multiple methods for students to
learn the material, such as visual aids, hands-on activities, and discussion
groups. This method is particularly effective for students with different
learning styles and abilities.
Advantages of
Teacher-Centered Learning
There are some
benefits to using teacher-centered learning methods.
1.
One
of the main benefits is that it can be a more efficient way to deliver
information to students.
2.
Lectures
and direct instruction can cover a large amount of material in a short amount of
time.
3.
It
can also be easier for the teacher to assess whether or not the students have
learned the material, as they can administer tests and quizzes to measure their
knowledge.
4.
Another
benefit of teacher-centered learning is that it can be a more structured
approach.
5.
Students
know what to expect in terms of content and assessment, and they may feel more
comfortable with this approach.
Disadvantages of
Teacher-Centered Learning
However, there
are also drawbacks to using teacher-centered learning methods.
1.
One
of the main drawbacks is that it can be less engaging for students.
2.
Students
may become bored or disinterested if they are passive receivers of information
and not actively engaged in the learning process.
3.
This
can lead to a lack of motivation and a decrease in learning outcomes.
4.
Another
drawback of teacher-centered learning is that it may not meet the needs of all
students.
5.
Students
have different learning styles and abilities, and a one-size-fits-all approach
may not be effective for everyone. This can lead to students feeling frustrated
or left behind in their learning.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
teacher-centered and student-centered approaches are two major methods of
instruction in educational psychology. While teacher-centered approaches may be
more efficient and structured, they may not engage all students and may not
meet the needs of individual learners. On the other hand, student-centered
approaches prioritize the needs and interests of students and can lead to
deeper learning outcomes. By understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each
approach, educators can make informed decisions about which methods to use in
their classrooms.
References:
1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R.,
& Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A
revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
2. ]. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
4. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A.
(1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher
Education Report No. 1. Jossey-Bass.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., &
Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.
National Academy Press.
6. Brookfield, S. D. (2015). The Skillful
Teacher: On Technique, Trust, and Responsiveness in the Classroom (3rd ed.).
Jossey-Bass.
7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and
Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
8. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple
intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books.
9. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games
have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional
development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,
8(3/4), 381–391.
11. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. R.
(2014). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. Routledge.
12. Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C.
(2000). Engaging Children's Minds: The Project Approach. Ablex Publishing.
13. Klein, J. D. (2012). Inquiry-based
learning. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2,
103–114.
14. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and
Instruction (2nd ed.). Pearson.
15. McLeod, S. A. (2015). Kolb - Learning
Styles. Simply Psychology.
16. Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R.
(2000). An evaluation of the use of intelligent tutoring systems for training
Army recruits. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt.
17. Ormrod, J. E. (2012). Human Learning
(6th ed.). Pearson.
18. Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget's theory. In
Piaget and his school (pp. 11–23). Springer.
19. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives,
digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
20. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D.
(2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (5th ed.). Human
Kinetics.
21. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A.
(2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing
interventions. Handbook of self-regulation, 631–649.
22. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The Science of
Learning and the Art of Teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in
Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University
Press.
24. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.).
