Cognitive Psychology: Perception of Movement; Understanding the Mechanisms

 (CP-14) Perception of Movement: Understanding the Mechanisms

Abstract:

This article provides an in-depth understanding of the perception of movement, including the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved. Movement perception enables us to interact with our environment and engage in various activities. There are different types of movement perception, such as apparent, induced, autokinetic, short-range, and long-range movement. The mechanism of movement perception involves the detection, integration, and interpretation of motion signals, supported by various brain areas such as V1, MT, and MST. Understanding these mechanisms can improve training programs and safer driving strategies. The article emphasizes the importance of the perception of movement in our daily lives, enabling us to detect and interpret changes in the position of an object. Perception of movement has significant implications and is a complex and dynamic process involving several stages of visual processing and neural mechanisms in the brain.

Introduction:Top of Form

IntroductionfffffBottom of FormTop of Form

The perception of movement is an essential aspect of our daily experience, allowing us to navigate through our environment and interact with the world around us. This article will provide an in-depth understanding of the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in the perception of movement, including how the movement is perceived, the brain areas involved, and the different types of movement perception.

What is the Perception of Movement?

The perception of movement refers to the ability to detect and interpret changes in the position of an object over time. Our brains process visual input from our environment, allowing us to perceive motion accurately, which is crucial for tasks such as catching a ball, driving, and crossing a busy street.

Definition of Movement Perception:

Movement perception is the process of detecting and interpreting motion in the environment. It involves extracting information about the speed, direction, and trajectory of moving objects and integrating this information to form a coherent representation of movement.

What the Perception of Movement Implies:

The perception of movement has significant implications for our daily lives. It allows us to interact with the world around us, navigate through our environment, and engage in various activities such as sports and driving.

How the Movement is Perceived:

There are several ways in which movement is perceived, including apparent movement, induced movement, autokinetic movement, and short-range and long-range movement.

Perception of Apparent Movement:

Apparent movement is the perception of movement that is not physically present in the environment. It occurs when two or more stationary images are presented in quick succession, creating the illusion of motion.

Sequence of Successive Images that Create Apparent Movement:

Apparent movement occurs when there is a sequence of successive images presented in quick succession. Each image is presented for a short period, creating the illusion of motion when viewed together.

Characteristics of the Apparent Movement:

The characteristics of the apparent movement include the speed, direction, and trajectory of the perceived motion. These characteristics can be manipulated by altering the interval between the successive images, the duration of each image, and the position of the images.

·         Short-range Movement: Short-range movement refers to the perception of motion that occurs within a limited visual field. It is characterized by the movement of objects that are within a few degrees of each other and can be easily tracked by the eyes.

·         Long-range Movement: Long-range movement refers to the perception of motion that occurs over a greater distance, typically outside the range of visual tracking. It involves the integration of motion signals across a larger visual field.

Perception of Induced Movement:

Induced movement is the perception of motion that is created by a moving background or context. For example, when watching a movie, we perceive the movement of characters and objects on the screen, even though the screen itself is stationary.

Autokinetic Movement:

Autokinetic movement is the perception of motion that occurs when a stationary object appears to move in the absence of external movement. It is believed to occur due to the natural movements of the eyes, which create small involuntary movements that can be perceived as motion.

Mechanism of Movement Perception:

The mechanism of movement perception involves several stages, including motion detection, motion integration, and motion interpretation.

Phases of Movement Perception:

The first phase of movement perception involves the detection of local motion signals in the visual input. These signals are then integrated across space and time to form coherent motion patterns. Finally, the brain interprets the motion signals to create a representation of movement.

Perception of Movement and the Brain:

The perception of movement is supported by different areas of the brain, including the primary visual cortex (V1), the middle temporal area (MT), and the medial superior temporal area (MST). These areas are involved in the processing of motion signals and the interpretation of movement.

Motion Detection:

The detection of motion signals involves the activity of specialized neurons known as direction-selective cells, which respond selectively to motion in specific directions. These cells are located in the middle temporal area (MT) and medial superior temporal area (MST) and are thought to integrate motion signals from different parts of the visual field to detect movement accurately.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the perception of movement is a complex and dynamic process that involves several stages of visual processing and neural mechanisms in the brain. The perception of movement has significant implications for our daily lives, and understanding its cognitive and neural mechanisms can inform the development of better training programs for athletes and safer driving strategies for drivers. Further research in this area can shed light on the mechanisms underlying perception and improve our understanding of the visual system's capabilities.

References:

1. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(1), 13-21.
2. Britten, K. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1998). Motion processing and sensory-motor integration. In Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 11, pp. 221-244). Elsevier.
3. Culham, J. C., & Kanwisher, N. G. (2001). Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Current opinion in neurobiology, 11(2), 157-163.
4. Gegenfurtner, K. R., & Hawken, M. J. (2016). Perception of motion. In The New Visual Neurosciences (pp. 685-696). MIT Press.
5. Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(45), 10420-10436.
6. Kourtzi, Z., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2006). Learning and neural plasticity in visual object recognition. Current opinion in neurobiology, 16(2), 152-158.
7. Lisberger, S. G., & Movshon, J. A. (2015). Visual motion perception. Annual review of neuroscience, 38, 369-385.
8. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412(6843), 150-157.
9. Maunsell, J. H., & Newsome, W. T. (1987). Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annual review of neuroscience, 10(1), 363-401.
10. Mather, G., & Moulden, B. (1980). A simultaneous shift in apparent direction: further evidence for a “distribution shift” model of direction coding. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(3), 325-333.
11. McIntosh, R. D., & Lashley, G. (2008). The neurobiology of visual attention: from neurons to cognition. Progress in Neurobiology, 86(4), 345-372.
12. Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(9), 387-393.
13. Orban, G. A., Van Essen, D., & Vanduffel, W. (2004). Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(7), 315-324.
14. Palmer, S. E., & Kellman, P. J. (1991). A review of the “moving room” paradigm in studies of visual perception of self-motion. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(3), 295-311.
15. Saffell, T., & Cosgrove, D. (2010). A guide to analogue and digital motion capture systems. Computer animation and virtual worlds, 21(3-4), 259-268.
16. Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1998). The variable discharge of cortical

Top of Form